Assignment Review
Streamline grading with AI-powered assignment review
Save time and enhance feedback quality with automated grading, AI-assisted evaluations, and structured peer review—all in one seamless workflow.
Book a demo
Peer reviews are too time-consuming and often result in vague, unhelpful feedback.
Managing peer reviews is time-consuming—from setting up groups to ensuring feedback is fair and useful. Without guidance, students often give vague comments that don't help, leaving instructors to moderate and chase missing reviews.
Peer Review eliminates these challenges by automating peer feedback workflows, structured rubrics, and AI-powered assistance, ensuring high-quality feedback while reducing instructor workload.
Peer Review eliminates these challenges by automating peer feedback workflows, structured rubrics, and AI-powered assistance, ensuring high-quality feedback while reducing instructor workload.
Elevate your peer feedback activities with Peer Review
Reduce Instructor Workload with Automation
Automate feedback distribution, deadline reminders, and progress tracking, saving time while keeping students engaged.
Ensure high-quality, actionable feedback
Structured rubrics and AI-powered feedback suggestions help students provide clear, constructive comments—eliminating vague or unhelpful reviews.
Fully customize the peer review process
Adapt peer review to any assignment or discipline with customizable rubrics, feedback criteria, and reviewer distribution—ensuring alignment with your course objectives.
With Peer Review you can
Support various co Give feedback on individual & group assignments options
Students can hand in work as individuals or as a group. You can also ask students to hand in individually but shown in a group. When making it a group assignment, groups are automatically synced with the Learning Management System (LMS) to make the setup easier.Visual - Same as current website
Grade all types of deliverables
In the hand-in step, instructor can choose what type of files students can upload. The supported file types include documents, videos, audio, images, webpages and more. Students can also record video, audio or their screen without needing any third-party tool.
Customize criteria and rubrics
Structure and customize self-assessment criteria with options such as qualitative feedback criteria, scales, or rubrics.
Save Time with Reusable, Pre-Written Feedback
Speed up grading by reusing pre-written, customizable feedback for common mistakes—ensuring consistency while reducing repetitive work.
Have an AI-powered grading assistant
Use AI-generated feedback comments and suggested ratings to quickly assess student work—while maintaining full control over final grading.
Configure grading options
Turn the activities into either summative or formative assessment tasks by deciding which steps are graded and how much weight they carry for the final grade. Also, easily detect outliers with the built in analytics.
Gain Actionable Insights with Learning Analytics
Track student progress at every step with detailed activity analytics, helping you identify who needs support and how to best assist them.
Facilitate self-reflection
Encourage students to critically review, and reflect on their own contribution before assessing others’ work.
Check plagiarism with Turnitin
If the institution has a license with Turnitin, instructors can enable plagiarism check setting for students to have their submissions reviewed for plagiarism by Turnitin before the automated feedback activity.
Learn how top institutions are transforming feedback through Peer Review
When you give feedback, everything that you review ties in with the feedback rubric. That was very powerful for the faculty.
Patricia Luna
Director of Academic Technology, Texas A&M School of Public Health
When you give feedback, everything that you review ties in with the feedback rubric. That was very powerful for the faculty.
Patricia Luna
Director of Academic Technology, Texas A&M School of Public Health
When you give feedback, everything that you review ties in with the feedback rubric. That was very powerful for the faculty.
Patricia Luna
Director of Academic Technology, Texas A&M School of Public Health
When you give feedback, everything that you review ties in with the feedback rubric. That was very powerful for the faculty.
Patricia Luna
Director of Academic Technology, Texas A&M School of Public Health
Learning Activity Templates
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Peer workshop: Personal essay for creative writing
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Role play self-assessment using SPIN Selling methodology
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Peer Review: Role play self assessment
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Create Final Assessment Instructions using GRASPS Framework
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Real-World Problem-Solving Lab
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Social Annotation of Diverse Perspectives
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Peer-Learning: Discuss your Frayer Frame
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Critical analysis of GenAI content
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Peer review of AI-generated content
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
CBE peer review: Skills in action (Video or podcast-based)
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Share and discuss solutions for TBL (with AI reflection coach)
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Application exercise for TBL (with AI Discussion Coach)
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Team formation for TBL
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
Strengthening soft skills through peer feedback
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
Perspective swap discussion
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
Getting organized! Selecting the topic for the project
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
Interdisciplinary project: Group member assessment & reflection
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
Self Reflection of AI-generated Content
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Low (<10 min)
Creating effective student groups
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Individual and group quiz in team-based learning
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Creating effective student groups
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Prompt-based open discussion
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Low-stakes knowledge check
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Instructor feedback on oral presentations
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Self-assessment on skills | Reflection moments
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Interactive lecture presentation
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Guided reading comprehension
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Individual and group quiz in team-based learning
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
High (>30 min)
Self-assessment on deliverables
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
High (>30 min)
Pre-class preparation on a document
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
High (>30 min)
Pre-class preparation on a video
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
High (>30 min)
Pre-class preparation on an audio file
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Instant AI feedback on students' essays
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Instant AI feedback on research paper
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Introduction to course syllabus – Comprehension exercise
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Group collaboration evaluation for graduates
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Low (<10 min)
Undergraduate group evaluation
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
.avif)
Intermediate (10-30 min)
Instructor feedback on student research paper
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge Uptake
Fully modular
learning design
The Learning Design System allows you to mix and match any of the FeedbackFruits features into a learning design to support any pedagogy, modality, or discipline.
Explore the Learning Design System
Ready to unlock the full potential of Peer Review?
Take the next step by exploring the full capabilities of the Learning Design System.
Book a demo
Integrated in your LMS
so you and your students don't need a separate login account and do the activity with ease.
Secure and accessible
Your data is hosted by Microsoft Azure in your region. We're compliant with data protection laws including the GDPR and WCAG 2.1 (AA) accessibility standards.
Always here for support
Our team offers teachers and students 24/5 human support, help articles and workshops to familiarize instructors with FeedbackFruits.
