Download our new ebook: Feedback and assessment in higher education
chevron_right

Students at Griffith University develop teamwork and leadership qualities

Dan Hasan
|
September 15, 2020
DOMAIN
Medicine
Class Size
50
Instructor Workload
Learner Workload
ABOUT THE INSTITUTION
ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR(S)
ABOUT THE INSTITUTION
ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR(S)

Context

This is the final theoretical course in a Midwifery bachelor’s program, preparing students for graduation as a competent, capable, and caring midwifery practitioner.

The course is designed to support students’ teamwork skills within the framework of clinical practice and risk management. Furthermore, students practice and develop their midwifery leadership qualities, ready to be applied in their future careers.

The instructor decided to use Group Member Evaluation to help students build confidence and experience in the social aspects of the practice, while making it easier for both instructor and the students to see an overview of their feedback.

Learning journey
Gamified peer review
A framework to integrate game design elements into peer review for enhanced engagement and critical thinking
access now
Learning journey
Self-assessment for learner engagement
A framework to integrate game design elements into peer review for enhanced engagement and critical thinking
access now
Learning journey
Developmental portfolio for lifelong learning
Promote skills transfer and career readiness through technology-enhanced student portfolios
access now

Learning objectives

  • Students develop effective communication and collaboration skills applicable in diverse, international environments.
  • Students will gain a deeper understanding of the importance of effective leadership in midwifery.

Learning activities

Students work in teams of 4 - 6, appointing a group leader, to explore, examine and report on a critical incident in maternity care using risk management and clinical governance principles. Each team is required to prepare a presentation and present their findings to their peers. They then submit a self and peer assessment of each team member’s teamwork skills using Group Member Evaluation. Within this peer assessment, students use a 5-point scale to assess various criteria such as punctuality and communication.

These learning activities address the following level of Bloom’s Taxonomy:

  • Evaluate the skills of peers according to given criteria.

Assessment of learning outcomes

  • Group Member Evaluation was used for self and peer feedback for no marks. The students used this feedback plus immediate reflection to form the basis of a reflective piece that was the second part of the assessment item and the reflective piece was marked.

Notable outcomes

  • In a diverse student population, anonymous feedback through Group Member Evaluation worked well to help students give fair and unbiased feedback.
  • Students found the user interface straightforward and intuitive, lessening the extra cognitive load and allowing them to focus on the activity and the feedback. They generally completed the activity quickly, and left ample comments.
  • The instructor was able to see who had and hadn’t completed their work, allowing for a clear overview of students’ progress with the activity.
"I was so excited when I was introduced to FeedbackFruits as I could see it was such an elegant process for students to use." - Dr. Carolyn Hastie, Midwifery Lecturer

The role of the instructor

  • The instructor includes detailed instructions of learning activity in the course manual and makes explicit reference to the use of FeedbackFruits as part of the course.
  • After students proceed with the feedback process, the instructor checks the student overview within the tool to evaluate the group dynamics and assess student learning.
  • Metrics such as the average scores students received and the time spent giving feedback are used as general performance indicators.

Added value of technology

  • Apart from saving time and streamlining the feedback process from the instructor’s perspective, students also reported that they found the interface simple and easy to use.

Possible variation

By enabling Configurable Grading, the instructor can add a summative assessment element to the activity, for example allowing factors such as timely completion of the activity, and peers’ scores to contribute to each other’s final marks.

Share on social media

Recommended use cases

A full guide to understand the competency-based framework and how to utilize it to ensure career readiness and student success

Learn how instructors at ESSEC Business School utilized pedagogical tools and AI to transform formative assessment in large student cohorts

Discover how instructors at Reyjkavic University used gamification to enhance the peer review process

We gather the most valuable resources and learnings on pedagogy and email them to you every month.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Filling out this form means you agree to our Privacy Policy.