This article is part of the ebook: 'Online, Hybrid, or HyFlex? How to balance different modalities for active learning'
Consistent, clear, and nuanced terminology surrounding instructional modalities allows faculties to have a deeper understanding of educational settings, thus making it easier and more effective for cross-modality teaching. This article then aims to elaborate on a framework to help institutions establish a universal definition of different learning modalities (online, hybrid, HyFLex, in-person), and highlight the pros and cons of each mode in relation to active learning.
University teaching should focus on active learning in the wake of the rise of artificial intelligence, the “600-pound gorilla in the room”. - Focus on active learning urged in response to rise of ChatGPT
This is the key takeaway from the *Times Higher Education*’s MENA Universities Summit on November 13-15, which aims to promote innovation, agility and strong national and regional collaboration across institutions. During the conference, participants emphasized the importance of active learning in “creating communities of people are self-aware, who can question” the capacity of AI.
Despite the benefits, active learning implementation can be challenging, due to the demanding nature of cross-modality teaching. Education is no longer confined to physical classroom, but has expanded to many forms (online, hybrid, HyFlex, etc.) to embrace technology advances and speak to learners’ diverse needs.
Therefore, institutions need to develop a deep, universal understanding of different instructional modes to promote an active learning environment. The next section will elaborate on the definitions of each learning modality, as well as it pros and cons.
The 2023 Educause Horizon Report | Teaching and Learning edition emphasizes the importance of developing a common language for instructional modalities:
“Without common language to describe learning modalities, discussion between and even within institutions can be challenging. Establishing clear and agreed-upon definitions for various learning modalities helps faculty design their courses and find the right types of support (e.g., instructional technology, instructional design, faculty development)."
Developing a shared understanding of different instructional modes is absolutely critical for institutions when designing courses and delivering expectations to the students. As for the learners, “a clear vocabulary” lets them know what they are expected to learn and achieve in different formats of learning.
When it comes to defining different course delivery modes such as “online”, “hybrid”, “blended”, “HyFlex”, “in-person”, and “synchronous and asynchronous”, there has been a lack of consensus among institutions, their policies, and individuals regarding what these terms entail and the type of learning experiences involved.
The rise of different learning modalities was sparked by the introduction of the World Wide Web (WWW) during the 1990s. As the learning materials could then be accessed easily via the Internet, this created a learning experience commonly referred to as e-learning or online learning. Institutions later on attempted to further integrate technology into educational practices, which led to the emergence of several new learning modes namely hybrid, blended, and HyFlex.
“A side-effect of having an expansion in delivery modes over a relatively short span of 30 years was the simultaneous eruption of naming conventions to describe idiosyncrasies in course delivery.” (Johnson, Seaman, & Poulin, 2022)
Upon the COVID-19 outburst and the rise of AI within just a few years, institutions have realized the importance of varying course modalities and technology-enhanced education. Such demand necessitates a universal understanding of different delivery modes across faculties, thus the need for consistency in defining online, hybrid, in-person, and Hyflex learning.
That’s why Johnson, Seam, and Poulin (2022) introduced the Revised Modes of Learning Spectrum, which describes and categorizes different learning modes into either “Distance learning” or “In-person learning”. This framework is based on an in-depth study of how administrators and faculties representing different higher education institutions understand and implement different learning modes.
According to this framework, the learning modes are categorized into two extremes: distance learning and in-person learning.
Distance learning refers to all learning that takes place remotely. Online learning (where the learning experience is delivered via the Internet either synchronously or asynchronously) is the predominant mode of distance learning; however, distance learning also includes offline distance learning (where the learning experience is fully remote but does not use Internet technology, such as a course being delivered in print format via mail).
In-person learning (or face-to-face and on-campus learning) involves the learning that takes place entirely in the physical classrooms with both students and instructors. In-person learning may utilize a variety of technologies (learning management systems, open educational resources, recorded lectures, etc.) to support the learning experiences. This is called In-person Technology-Supported Learning. On the other hand, face-to-face learning that uses no technology is referred to as In-Person Non-Digital Learning.
Standing between Distance and In-person learning is Hybrid or Blended learning, which combines both online and in-person instruction. Hybrid learning refers to an umbrella term “that captures all different types of hybrid learning such as flipped learning, HyFlex learning, and online learning with an in-person intensive component” (Johnson et al. 2022).
The variations of each learning mode are also included in the framework to show how these terms are being used in the real world and provide a path towards shared terminology, as stated by the authors.
In this section you will find definitions of different learning modalities, along with its benefits and challenges when implementing active learning strategies.
You can also download these information in the table format.
Online learning: all instruction and interactions are fully online (synchronous or asynchronous)
Hybrid and Blended learning: a combination of online and in-person instruction (online instruction is synchronous or asynchronous)Blended learning: Can be used interchangeably with Hybrid learning. For Hybrid learning, Smith and Hill (2019) proposed that 30-79% of the content is delivered online” (p.7).
HyFlex learning: This modality lets students have more control and flexibility in choosing their preferred learning modes. This is also referred to as multi-access learning by Irvine (2020), in which students can move among 4 levels: face-to-face, synchronous online, asynchronous online, and open-access.
In-person learning: All the learning takes place in an in-person setting.
Synchronous learning: Instruction takes place in real-time and requires student presence (in-person or virtual) at a set time
Asynchronous learning: Instruction is available for students to access at a time that works best for them.
Johnson, N., Seaman, J., Poulin, R. (2022). Defining different modes of learning: Resolving confusion and contention through consensus. Online Learning, 26(3), 91-110
Johnson, N. (2020). Evolving Definitions in Digital Learning: A National Framework for Categorizing Commonly Used Terms. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. http://www.cdlra-acrfl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021-CDLRA-definitions-report-5.pdf
Discover how to maintain continuous student engagement at every stage of your course using Interactive Document
Explore how to best implement active learning strategies with deep understanding of different modalities
FeedbackFruits announces partnerships with many institutions worldwide over the past 4 months