Get ready for the new semester with FeedbackFruits
chevron_right

Why anonymity can be a valuable element in peer-evaluation?

Ananda Verheijen
|
July 4, 2016
Because peer assessment is a fundamentally social and collaborative learning activity, learners’ interpersonal beliefs and biais can negatively impact its outcomes. This includes negative feelings caused by interpersonal variables such as friendship, psychological unsafety, fear of disapproval when giving a low score or negative feedback, and distrust in one’s own and others’ evaluative capabilities (Rotsaert et al., 2018).

In order to overcome the issues above, and to reduce bias when students are reviewing, it can be an advantage to perform reviews in an anonymized fashion. Previous research has shown that providing anonymity to assessors can help relieve these interpersonal burdens from students, especially in peer assessment activities in which grades are given (Yu & Liu, 2009). Furthermore, providing anonymity can lead to more positive perceptions towards peer assessment, it can help students to become more willing to give critical feedback (Miyazoe & Anderson, 2011).

FeedbackFruits’ Peer Review allows for double blinded anonymity; where reviewers are not told who authored the submission and submitters are not told who wrote the reviews they receive. In order to hide the identity of the submitters both the Peer Review & Group Member Evaluation tool automatically create pseudonyms when anonymity is enabled. Only the teacher is able to see who wrote the review.

Miyazoe and Anderson (2011) concluded that online pseudonym-based activities are an effective strategy to induce higher production of critically written feedback. The opportunity to use pseudonyms within FeedbackFruits was also highly appreciated by students within the Vrije Universiteit who used the tool this year. The actual VU use case description can be found in the first article of this newsletter.

A disadvantage is that anonymous settings do not reflect daily face to-face (working) situations in which people give and receive feedback with known identities. These critical skills are essential, and using peer feedback to strengthen them is key, because the peer feedback process doesn’t just create a better end product, it can help to craft a more versatile, adaptable, and problem-solving individual. At all times, the teacher is responsible to create a safe and supportive learning environment in which students feel comfortable and confident to assess their peers in a qualitative matter.

Because peer assessment is a fundamentally social and collaborative learning activity, learners’ interpersonal beliefs and biais can negatively impact its outcomes. This includes negative feelings caused by interpersonal variables such as friendship, psychological unsafety, fear of disapproval when giving a low score or negative feedback, and distrust in one’s own and others’ evaluative capabilities (Rotsaert et al., 2018).

In order to overcome the issues above, and to reduce bias when students are reviewing, it can be an advantage to perform reviews in an anonymized fashion. Previous research has shown that providing anonymity to assessors can help relieve these interpersonal burdens from students, especially in peer assessment activities in which grades are given (Yu & Liu, 2009). Furthermore, providing anonymity can lead to more positive perceptions towards peer assessment, it can help students to become more willing to give critical feedback (Miyazoe & Anderson, 2011).

FeedbackFruits’ Peer Review allows for double blinded anonymity; where reviewers are not told who authored the submission and submitters are not told who wrote the reviews they receive. In order to hide the identity of the submitters both the Peer Review & Group Member Evaluation tool automatically create pseudonyms when anonymity is enabled. Only the teacher is able to see who wrote the review.

Miyazoe and Anderson (2011) concluded that online pseudonym-based activities are an effective strategy to induce higher production of critically written feedback. The opportunity to use pseudonyms within FeedbackFruits was also highly appreciated by students within the Vrije Universiteit who used the tool this year. The actual VU use case description can be found in the first article of this newsletter.

A disadvantage is that anonymous settings do not reflect daily face to-face (working) situations in which people give and receive feedback with known identities. These critical skills are essential, and using peer feedback to strengthen them is key, because the peer feedback process doesn’t just create a better end product, it can help to craft a more versatile, adaptable, and problem-solving individual. At all times, the teacher is responsible to create a safe and supportive learning environment in which students feel comfortable and confident to assess their peers in a qualitative matter.

Because peer assessment is a fundamentally social and collaborative learning activity, learners’ interpersonal beliefs and biais can negatively impact its outcomes. This includes negative feelings caused by interpersonal variables such as friendship, psychological unsafety, fear of disapproval when giving a low score or negative feedback, and distrust in one’s own and others’ evaluative capabilities (Rotsaert et al., 2018).

In order to overcome the issues above, and to reduce bias when students are reviewing, it can be an advantage to perform reviews in an anonymized fashion. Previous research has shown that providing anonymity to assessors can help relieve these interpersonal burdens from students, especially in peer assessment activities in which grades are given (Yu & Liu, 2009). Furthermore, providing anonymity can lead to more positive perceptions towards peer assessment, it can help students to become more willing to give critical feedback (Miyazoe & Anderson, 2011).

FeedbackFruits’ Peer Review allows for double blinded anonymity; where reviewers are not told who authored the submission and submitters are not told who wrote the reviews they receive. In order to hide the identity of the submitters both the Peer Review & Group Member Evaluation tool automatically create pseudonyms when anonymity is enabled. Only the teacher is able to see who wrote the review.

Miyazoe and Anderson (2011) concluded that online pseudonym-based activities are an effective strategy to induce higher production of critically written feedback. The opportunity to use pseudonyms within FeedbackFruits was also highly appreciated by students within the Vrije Universiteit who used the tool this year. The actual VU use case description can be found in the first article of this newsletter.

A disadvantage is that anonymous settings do not reflect daily face to-face (working) situations in which people give and receive feedback with known identities. These critical skills are essential, and using peer feedback to strengthen them is key, because the peer feedback process doesn’t just create a better end product, it can help to craft a more versatile, adaptable, and problem-solving individual. At all times, the teacher is responsible to create a safe and supportive learning environment in which students feel comfortable and confident to assess their peers in a qualitative matter.

Quality online teaching and learning

An ebook that helps you design meaningful learning experiences in any course modality
DOWNLOAD NOW

Quality online teaching and learning

An ebook that helps you design meaningful learning experiences in any course modality
DOWNLOAD NOW
FeedbackFruits Educators Initiative supports educators with lifelong free access to our pedagogical tools.
Share on social media

Most popular blog posts

Student Success
|
4/11/2021

How to create personalized learning spaces

5 ways to personalized the learning experiences based on the key student-centered learning principles

Industry News
|
4/11/2021

What to expect in the new semester and beyond

The 5 key trends that will certainly take place in the upcoming Fall semester and beyond, according to educational leaders.

Industry News
|
3/10/2020

10 reasons why educators love FeedbackFruits

Educators from different institutions share 10 factors that persuaded them to adopt FeedbackFruits for better course design.

More from FeedbackFruits tips series

Technology Tips
|
5/10/2022

9 time-saving ways to upgrade your course design with FeedbackFruits

9 technology-assisted strategies to minimize time spent on manual course set-ups, and maximize student engagement, retention and success.

Assessment
|
16/9/2022

Save time integrating formative assessment with FeedbackFruits

Explore why you should adopt formative assessment, and how this can be integrated quickly and easily at any stage of your course.

Technology Tips
|
24/8/2022

5 ways to flip the classroom with Interactive Video | FeedbackFruits tips

How to use Interactive Video to flip the classroom successfully. 5 best tips shared by educators.

Subscribe for educational articles, practical pedagogical tips & tricks, event updates, invites and more. Unsubscribe anytime.

Filling out this form means you agree to our Privacy Policy.