icon
Peer Review

Turn student feedback into a scalable learning experience

Streamline the entire peer review process: from assignment submission to graded feedback. Students get clear, rubric-guided prompts so their comments are useful. Instructors get automated workflows so they're not chasing submissions or moderating vague reviews.
Book a demo
Visual image

Peer reviews often create more work than value.

Setting up peer reviews, managing submissions, tracking participation, and moderating feedback can quickly become overwhelming. At the same time, students often struggle to provide feedback that is specific, actionable, and useful.

Peer Review automates the process and guides students through structured feedback activities, helping educators scale peer learning without sacrificing quality.

Managing peer reviews is time-consuming; from setting up groups to ensuring feedback is fair and useful. Without guidance, students often give vague comments that don't help, leaving instructors to moderate and chase missing reviews.
Student

Elevate your peer feedback activities with Peer Review

Reduce instructor workload with automation

Automate feedback distribution, deadline reminders, and progress tracking, saving time while keeping students engaged.
Visual image

Ensure high-quality, actionable feedback

Structured rubrics and AI-powered feedback suggestions help students provide clear, constructive comments—eliminating vague or unhelpful reviews.
Visual image

Fully customize the peer review process

Adapt peer review to any assignment or discipline with customizable rubrics, feedback criteria, and reviewer distribution—ensuring alignment with your course objectives.
Visual image

With Peer Review you can

Visual image

Individual vs group peer feedback

Visual image

Support various
file types

Visual image

Create customizable criteria or rubrics

Visual image

Enable anonymous reviews

Visual image

Promote self-assessment

Visual image

Configure Grading to Fit Your Course

Facilitate individual and group peer feedback

Enable both individual and group-based peer assessments, allowing students to review peers’ work as individuals or collectively as a team. This ensures flexibility across different assignment types.
Visual image

Support various file types

Allow students to submit and review different file formats, including documents, presentations, PDFs, images, and more, ensuring compatibility across diverse assignments.
Visual image

Customize rubrics and feedback criteria

Design rubrics and criteria that fit your learning objectives, ensuring structured, consistent, and meaningful peer evaluations across assignments.
Visual image

Enable anonymous feedback

Choose whether students give feedback anonymously or with attribution, creating a safe and constructive review environment based on your course needs.
Visual image

Include self-assessment for deeper reflection

Allow students to evaluate their own work using the same structured rubric as their peers, promoting self-reflection and critical thinking.
Visual image

Configure grading to fit your course

Set up custom grading workflows, whether using scores, pass/fail criteria, or qualitative feedback, ensuring alignment with your grading strategy.
Visual image

Create consistent, high- quality rubrics faster

Rubric Assistant helps educators build pedagogy-backed assessment criteria in minutes, improving consistency while reducing course setup time.
Student

Planning for Fall 2026? Start with a pilot

Evaluate the impact of Peer Review in real courses before making a larger commitment. Our fully supported pilot program gives your institution the time, guidance, and evidence needed to make informed decisions.
Schedule a pilot consultation

Learn how top institutions are transforming feedback through Peer Review

Icon
Self and peer assessment at our faculty has provided teaching teams with evidence of student engagement, as well as enabling students to hold each other accountable within the task.
Dr. Tiffany Gunning
Senior Lecturer Curriculum Design and Development
Deakin University
Read case study
slider image
Icon
FeedbackFruits saved hours of work, setting up the assignment was fast and grading was even faster.
Patricia Luna
Director of Academic Technology Texas A&M University School of Public Health
Read case study
slider image
Icon
Whether it’s peer review, group member evaluation, or one of the [engagement activities], FeedbackFruits does the heavy lifting of providing a structure and workflow.
Andrew Feldstein
Assistant Provost for Teaching Innovation and Learning Technologies Fort Hays State University
Read case study
slider image
Icon
By leveraging [FeedbackFruits], we aim to empower faculty with innovative methods for interactive teaching, peer assessment, and personalized feedback
Melody J. Buckner
Associate Vice Provost
University of Arizona
Read case study
slider image
Icon
Using FeedbackFruits for the first time made the entire process significantly easier
John Lee
Department Chair of Engineering
Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering
John Brown University
Read case study
slider image
Slider Arrow
Slider Arrow
Light Icon

Ready-to-use peer review templates

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Glow and grow: Feedback on oral presentations

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Group member evaluation of roles and contributions for capstone project

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Group member evaluation of teamwork and communication skills

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Pre-project survey for group formation

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Interim evaluation of group contributions and collaboration

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer review of data visualisation report designs

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Final group member evaluation for group project

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer review of student designed learning games

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer and self-evaluation of group project contributions

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Discussion and peer feedback on project concepts

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer feedback and self reflection on collaboration skills

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer review of student-created AI assistants

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer review for robotics project development

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Group game demonstration and skill review

Clock Icon
High (>30 min)

Stepping into a manager’s shoes with interactive document

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer and self-Assessment of group contributions

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Enhancing AI literacy through interactive reading

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Mid-Project Team Performance Evaluation

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Exploring red flag legal issues through podcast and peer discussion

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Onboarding students to peer review

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

End of module group member evaluation

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Building comprehension of course materials for individual and team learning

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Interactive exploration of key course concepts

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Using team-based learning to inform project planning

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Enhancing leadership storytelling through peer review

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Examining challenging topics in education through podcast and discussion

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Mastering AI prompts: watch, practice, and reflect

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Practicing using AI to build strong essay arguments

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Exploring real-world teaching scenarios through social annotation

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Clarity through feedback: 
A physics peer review workshop

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Developing critical writing skills through peer review and reflection

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Building your own team structure with interactive document

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Collaborative audio task: the power of emphasis

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Group member evaluation and reflection

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Exploring active and technology enhanced learning through interactive document

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Real-time group member evaluation during group presentation

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Self-assessment of values, learning, and skills for future career decisions

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Reading and annotating sample place narratives

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Analyzing leadership and emotional intelligence through social annotation

Knowledge uptake
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Case study analysis and peer feedback

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer review for policy analysis and evaluation

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Reflection on learning objectives with the SOLO rubric

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Analyzing a topic through interactive video

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Reflecting on intersectionality with interactive document

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Providing feedback on learning portfolio presentations

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Group peer feedback: Let’s keep it fair & fun!

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Gamified team based concept defence

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Gamified peer feedback: Leveling up through constructive critique

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

CBE skill review with a Mastery Check rubric

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Deepening critical understanding through discussion

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Gamified quiz for competition, debate, and learning

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Cultural reflection discussion

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Social-emotional learning based Peer Review

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Strengthening research quality through structured peer feedback

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Unpacking misconceptions through discussions

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Exploring intersectionality through interactive Video

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Self-reflection: Connecting learning to personal growth

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Co-designing the course: Interactive syllabus feedback

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Designing personalized learning through student choice

Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Reflection on socratic discussions with guided rubric

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Reflection and peer exchange around an ethical dilemma

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Using critical discussion to build upon arguments

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Interactive case study discussion around an ethical dilemma

Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Showcasing evolving perspectives through revision, peer critique, and reflection

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Transformative learning: Group discussion and self-reflection

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Challenging cognitive biases through reflection and peer feedback

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Exploring Hofstede's dimensions of culture through discussion

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Holistic team collaboration evaluation

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Interactive course syllabus

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer workshop: Personal essay for creative writing

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Role play self-assessment using SPIN Selling methodology

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer Review: Role play self assessment

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Create final assessment instructions using GRASPS framework

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Real-world problem-solving lab

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Social annotation of diverse perspectives

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Peer-learning: Discuss your Frayer Frame

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Critical analysis of GenAI content

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Peer review of AI-generated content

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

CBE peer review: Skills in action (Video or podcast-based)

Knowledge uptake
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Share and discuss solutions for TBL (with AI reflection coach)

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Application exercise for TBL (with AI Discussion Coach)

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Team formation for TBL

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Strengthening soft skills through peer feedback

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Perspective swap discussion

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Getting organized! Selecting the topic for the project

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Interdisciplinary project: Group member assessment & reflection

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Self Reflection of AI-generated Content

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Introduction to course syllabus – Comprehension exercise

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Creating effective student groups

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Individual and group quiz in team-based learning

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Creating effective student groups

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Prompt-based open discussion

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Low-stakes knowledge check

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Instructor feedback on oral presentations

Collaboration
Clock Icon
Low (<10 min)

Self-assessment on skills | Reflection moments

Critical thinking
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Interactive lecture presentation

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Guided reading comprehension

Knowledge uptake
Clock Icon
Intermediate (10-30 min)

Individual and group quiz in team-based learning

Problem-solving
Clock Icon
High (>30 min)

Self-assessment on deliverables

Knowledge uptake
Clock Icon
High (>30 min)

Pre-class preparation on a document

Collaboration

Fully modular
learning design

The Learning Design System allows you to mix and match any of the FeedbackFruits learning activities into a learning design to support any pedagogy, modality, or discipline.
Explore the Learning Design System

See peer review inside your LMS

We'll walk through your current approach, show how Peer Review works inside your LMS, and answer questions specific to your institutions' courses and goals.
Book a demo

LMS-integrated

Runs inside Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and Brightspace. No separate login for you or your students, and the same interface.

Secure and compliant

Your data is hosted by Microsoft Azure in your region. We're compliant with data protection laws including the GDPR and WCAG 2.1 (AA) accessibility standards.

24/5 human support

Real support for instructors and students, not bots. Plus onboarding workshops and a dedicated implementation team.
Footer background

Heading cczxczx 2

Book a demo
Close