Make high-quality peer feedback possible at scale

Everything you need to make
peer feedback work
With Peer review you can
Set clear standards for quality
Make quality clear with rubrics and criteria built around your learning objectives. Give students a shared framework for evaluating work and producing specific, actionable feedback.
Help students give better feedback
Feedback Coach uses real-time academic AI coaching to help students move beyond “good job” and make their feedback more specific, constructive, and actionable.
Make feedback part of the learning
Let students reflect on and respond to the feedback they receive, turning peer review into an ongoing learning conversation.
Connect self-reflection with peer feedback
Let students assess their own work against the same criteria as their peers. Comparing their own perspective with peer feedback encourages deeper reflection and learning.
Adapt peer review to any assignment
Support individual submissions, group work, or both. Set up peer review for different assignment types while keeping the experience structured and consistent.
Choose the (right) level of anonymity
Choose whether reviews are anonymous or attributed to fit your course goals, whether you want to encourage candid feedback, accountability, or open discussion
Learn how top institutions are transforming feedback through Peer Review
Turn peer feedback into a better learning experience
for everyone
For students
Build skills that last beyond the classroom
For instructors
Make meaningful peer review manageable
For institutions
Scale a consistent peer review experience
See what better peer review looks like in practice
Peer Review that goes beyond "nice work"
Better peer feedback starts with better structure. Explore practical resources for designing peer-review activities, building effective rubrics, and helping students give feedback they can actually use.

A guide to authentic peer assessment in higher education
Learn how peer assessment builds the skills employers need most with research, real case studies, and a practical implementation roadmap.
Build a complete feedback and assessment workflow
Peer Review
Structured feedback on assignments
LMS-integrated
Secure and compliant
24/5 human support
See Peer Review inside your LMS
Prefer to start with a pilot? We have a limited number of pilot slots open for next semester.

Frequently asked questions
How does Peer Review keep student feedback consistent?
Instructors set customizable rubrics that every reviewer works from, so feedback stays anchored to the same criteria across the class instead of varying from reviewer to reviewer. Learn more here
Do students get help writing better feedback?
Yes, if the instructor turns on our Acai Feedback Coach. When it's enabled, it gives students real time guidance as they write. Teachers can also enable rotating feedback tips and a review checklist. Learn more here
Are peer reviews anonymous?
It depends on how the instructor sets up the activity. Peer reviews can be made fully anonymous, so students never see who reviewed them, or fully open, so students can see each other's names. Either way, instructors always have full visibility into every review submitted. Learn more here
What file types can students submit for review?
Peer Review supports documents, presentations, images, audio, video, code files, and more, so it works across disciplines and assignment types. Learn more here
Does Peer Review sync grades to my gradebook automatically?
Yes. Peer Review integrates directly with your LMS, so once an instructor publishes grades, they sync straight to the gradebook automatically, with no manual entry needed. Grades can be published all at once or on a schedule the instructor sets. Learn more here
Can groups complete a Peer Review together, and can teachers grade the quality of the feedback itself?
Yes to both. With the group review option, one student can submit or review on behalf of the whole group. Separately, instructors can turn on Feedback-on-Feedback, an optional step where the teacher reviews and grades the quality of the peer feedback students gave, on top of grading the original submission. Learn more here






